🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include events where Black people are remunerated to address white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to remove Black history and narrative from the records is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.